Reasoning strategies - 修訂歷史

Guhjy在2018年3月14日 (三) 09:29

2018-03-14T09:29:16Z

←上一修訂		在2018年3月14日 (三) 09:29所做的修訂版本
第16行：		第16行：
	*[http://www.accessmedicine.com/diag.aspx\| McGraw-Hill’s Diagnosaurus 2.0 on AccessMedicine]		*[http://www.accessmedicine.com/diag.aspx\| McGraw-Hill’s Diagnosaurus 2.0 on AccessMedicine]
	*[http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/338/jun08_2/b1860?view=long&pmid=19505957\| BMJ 2009;338:b1860: Errors in clinical reasoning: causes and remedial strategies]		*[http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/338/jun08_2/b1860?view=long&pmid=19505957\| BMJ 2009;338:b1860: Errors in clinical reasoning: causes and remedial strategies]
-	*[~~http~~://~~ajws~~.~~elsevier~~.com/~~ajws3~~/~~abstract~~.~~asp~~?~~art_id~~=~~4564~~&~~art_journals~~=1\| Kaohsiung J Med Sci 2008;24:341: Current Trends in Developing Medical Students' Critical Thinking Abilities]	+	*[https://ac.els-cdn.com/S1607551X08701311/1-s2.0-S1607551X08701311-main.pdf?_tid=0fa3962d-eae5-4be9-8e61-b281bfabdf77&acdnat=1521019662_8f53f85db7fd3d675a663408be840d29\| Kaohsiung J Med Sci 2008;24:341: Current Trends in Developing Medical Students' Critical Thinking Abilities]

Guhjy在2018年3月14日 (三) 09:05

2018-03-14T09:05:08Z

←上一修訂		在2018年3月14日 (三) 09:05所做的修訂版本
第15行：		第15行：
	*[http://en.diagnosispro.com/differential_diagnosis/home/\| DiagnosisPro]		*[http://en.diagnosispro.com/differential_diagnosis/home/\| DiagnosisPro]
	*[http://www.accessmedicine.com/diag.aspx\| McGraw-Hill’s Diagnosaurus 2.0 on AccessMedicine]		*[http://www.accessmedicine.com/diag.aspx\| McGraw-Hill’s Diagnosaurus 2.0 on AccessMedicine]
-	[http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/338/jun08_2/b1860?view=long&pmid=19505957\| BMJ 2009;338:b1860: Errors in clinical reasoning: causes and remedial strategies\|]	+	*[http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/338/jun08_2/b1860?view=long&pmid=19505957\| BMJ 2009;338:b1860: Errors in clinical reasoning: causes and remedial strategies]
	*[http://ajws.elsevier.com/ajws3/abstract.asp?art_id=4564&art_journals=1\| Kaohsiung J Med Sci 2008;24:341: Current Trends in Developing Medical Students' Critical Thinking Abilities]		*[http://ajws.elsevier.com/ajws3/abstract.asp?art_id=4564&art_journals=1\| Kaohsiung J Med Sci 2008;24:341: Current Trends in Developing Medical Students' Critical Thinking Abilities]

Guhjy在2018年3月14日 (三) 09:04

2018-03-14T09:04:42Z

←上一修訂		在2018年3月14日 (三) 09:04所做的修訂版本
第10行：		第10行：
	**Negative finding in a test with a high sensitivity ''rules out'' a diagnosis		**Negative finding in a test with a high sensitivity ''rules out'' a diagnosis
	**Positive finding in a test with a high specificity ''rules in'' a diagnosis		**Positive finding in a test with a high specificity ''rules in'' a diagnosis
-	<<<
	*[http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/extract/355/21/2217\| NEJM: Educational Strategies to Promote Clinical Diagnostic Reasoning]		*[http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/extract/355/21/2217\| NEJM: Educational Strategies to Promote Clinical Diagnostic Reasoning]
	*[http://www.im.org/Publications/PhysiciansInTraining/Documents/Primer2ndEd.pdf\| Primer to the Internal Medicine Clerkship]		*[http://www.im.org/Publications/PhysiciansInTraining/Documents/Primer2ndEd.pdf\| Primer to the Internal Medicine Clerkship]
	*[http://www.geocities.com/davidscerri/contents.html\|Differential Diagnoses in General Medicine\|]		*[http://www.geocities.com/davidscerri/contents.html\|Differential Diagnoses in General Medicine\|]
-	*[~~[DiagnosisPro\|~~http://en.diagnosispro.com/differential_diagnosis/home/]]	+	*[http://en.diagnosispro.com/differential_diagnosis/home/\| DiagnosisPro]
-	*[http://www.accessmedicine.com/diag.aspx\|McGraw-Hill’s Diagnosaurus 2.0 on AccessMedicine\|]	+	*[http://www.accessmedicine.com/diag.aspx\| McGraw-Hill’s Diagnosaurus 2.0 on AccessMedicine]
-	[http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/338/jun08_2/b1860?view=long&pmid=19505957\| BMJ 2009;338:b1860: Errors in clinical reasoning: causes and remedial strategies\|]*	+	[http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/338/jun08_2/b1860?view=long&pmid=19505957\| BMJ 2009;338:b1860: Errors in clinical reasoning: causes and remedial strategies\|]
	*[http://ajws.elsevier.com/ajws3/abstract.asp?art_id=4564&art_journals=1\| Kaohsiung J Med Sci 2008;24:341: Current Trends in Developing Medical Students' Critical Thinking Abilities]		*[http://ajws.elsevier.com/ajws3/abstract.asp?art_id=4564&art_journals=1\| Kaohsiung J Med Sci 2008;24:341: Current Trends in Developing Medical Students' Critical Thinking Abilities]

Guhjy在2018年3月14日 (三) 09:03

2018-03-14T09:03:51Z

Guhjy在2018年3月14日 (三) 09:03

2018-03-14T09:03:00Z

←上一修訂		在2018年3月14日 (三) 09:03所做的修訂版本
第5行：		第5行：
	*[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam\| Occam's razor: Wikipedia]		*[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam\| Occam's razor: Wikipedia]
	**When you have two competing theories that make exactly the same predictions, the simpler one is the better		**When you have two competing theories that make exactly the same predictions, the simpler one is the better
-	*[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sutton's_law\|Sutton's law: Wikipedia\|]	+	*[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sutton's_law\| Sutton's law: Wikipedia\|]
	**Go where the money is		**Go where the money is
	**Consider the most likely conditions that the patient might have and do those tests first that have the highest liklihood of making the diagnosis the quickest and at the least expense		**Consider the most likely conditions that the patient might have and do those tests first that have the highest liklihood of making the diagnosis the quickest and at the least expense

Guhjy在2018年3月14日 (三) 09:02

2018-03-14T09:02:16Z

←上一修訂		在2018年3月14日 (三) 09:02所做的修訂版本
第3行：		第3行：
	*[[3. Pattern recognition]]		*[[3. Pattern recognition]]
	**''Expert'' diagnosticians tend to use pattern recognition and algorithmic thinking, but return to hypothetico-deductive reasoning if the first two strategies are unsuccessful. ''Novice'' clinical reasoners tend to use hypothetico-deductive reasoning more often than the other strategies.		**''Expert'' diagnosticians tend to use pattern recognition and algorithmic thinking, but return to hypothetico-deductive reasoning if the first two strategies are unsuccessful. ''Novice'' clinical reasoners tend to use hypothetico-deductive reasoning more often than the other strategies.
-	*[[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam\| Occam's razor: Wikipedia]]	+	*[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam\| Occam's razor: Wikipedia]
	**When you have two competing theories that make exactly the same predictions, the simpler one is the better		**When you have two competing theories that make exactly the same predictions, the simpler one is the better
-	*[~~[Sutton's law: Wikipedia\|~~http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sutton's_law]]	+	*[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sutton's_law\|Sutton's law: Wikipedia\|]
	**Go where the money is		**Go where the money is
	**Consider the most likely conditions that the patient might have and do those tests first that have the highest liklihood of making the diagnosis the quickest and at the least expense		**Consider the most likely conditions that the patient might have and do those tests first that have the highest liklihood of making the diagnosis the quickest and at the least expense
第11行：		第11行：
	**Positive finding in a test with a high specificity ''rules in'' a diagnosis		**Positive finding in a test with a high specificity ''rules in'' a diagnosis
	<<<		<<<
-	~~NEJM:~~ [~~[Educational Strategies to Promote Clinical Diagnostic Reasoning\|~~http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/extract/355/21/2217]]	+	[http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/extract/355/21/2217\| NEJM: Educational Strategies to Promote Clinical Diagnostic Reasoning]
-	[~~[Primer to the Internal Medicine Clerkship\|~~http://www.im.org/Publications/PhysiciansInTraining/Documents/Primer2ndEd.pdf]]	+	[http://www.im.org/Publications/PhysiciansInTraining/Documents/Primer2ndEd.pdf\| Primer to the Internal Medicine Clerkship]
-	[~~[Differential Diagnoses in General Medicine\|~~http://www.geocities.com/davidscerri/contents.html]]	+	[http://www.geocities.com/davidscerri/contents.html\|Differential Diagnoses in General Medicine\|]
	[[DiagnosisPro\|http://en.diagnosispro.com/differential_diagnosis/home/]]		[[DiagnosisPro\|http://en.diagnosispro.com/differential_diagnosis/home/]]
-	[~~[McGraw-Hill’s Diagnosaurus 2.0 on AccessMedicine\|~~http://www.accessmedicine.com/diag.aspx]]	+	[http://www.accessmedicine.com/diag.aspx\|McGraw-Hill’s Diagnosaurus 2.0 on AccessMedicine\|]
-	~~BMJ 2009;338:b1860:~~ [~~[Errors in clinical reasoning: causes and remedial strategies\|~~http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/338/jun08_2/b1860?view=long&pmid=19505957]]	+	[http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/338/jun08_2/b1860?view=long&pmid=19505957\| BMJ 2009;338:b1860: Errors in clinical reasoning: causes and remedial strategies\|]
-	~~Kaohsiung J Med Sci 2008~~;24:~~341~~: ~~[[Current Trends~~ in ~~Developing Medical Students' Critical Thinking Abilities~~\|http://ajws.elsevier.com/ajws3/abstract.asp?art_id=4564&art_journals=1]]	+	[http://ajws.elsevier.com/ajws3/abstract.asp?art_id=4564&art_journals=1\| Kaohsiung J Med Sci 2008;24:341: Current Trends in Developing Medical Students' Critical Thinking Abilities]
	<<<		<<<

Guhjy在2018年3月14日 (三) 08:59

2018-03-14T08:59:26Z

←上一修訂		在2018年3月14日 (三) 08:59所做的修訂版本
第3行：		第3行：
	*[[3. Pattern recognition]]		*[[3. Pattern recognition]]
	**''Expert'' diagnosticians tend to use pattern recognition and algorithmic thinking, but return to hypothetico-deductive reasoning if the first two strategies are unsuccessful. ''Novice'' clinical reasoners tend to use hypothetico-deductive reasoning more often than the other strategies.		**''Expert'' diagnosticians tend to use pattern recognition and algorithmic thinking, but return to hypothetico-deductive reasoning if the first two strategies are unsuccessful. ''Novice'' clinical reasoners tend to use hypothetico-deductive reasoning more often than the other strategies.
-	*[[~~Occam's razor: Wikipedia\|~~http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam]]	+	*[[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam\| Occam's razor: Wikipedia]]
	**When you have two competing theories that make exactly the same predictions, the simpler one is the better		**When you have two competing theories that make exactly the same predictions, the simpler one is the better
	*[[Sutton's law: Wikipedia\|http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sutton's_law]]		*[[Sutton's law: Wikipedia\|http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sutton's_law]]

Guhjy: 新頁面: 1. Hypothetico-deductive (backward) reasoning 2. Algorithmic (forward) reasoning *3. Pattern recognition **''Expert'' diagnosticians tend to use pattern recognition and algo...

2018-03-14T08:58:41Z

新頁面: *1. Hypothetico-deductive (backward) reasoning *2. Algorithmic (forward) reasoning *3. Pattern recognition **''Expert'' diagnosticians tend to use pattern recognition and algo...

新頁面

*[[1. Hypothetico-deductive (backward) reasoning]]
*[[2. Algorithmic (forward) reasoning]]
*[[3. Pattern recognition]]
**''Expert'' diagnosticians tend to use pattern recognition and algorithmic thinking, but return to hypothetico-deductive reasoning if the first two strategies are unsuccessful. ''Novice'' clinical reasoners tend to use hypothetico-deductive reasoning more often than the other strategies.
*[[Occam's razor: Wikipedia|http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam]]
**When you have two competing theories that make exactly the same predictions, the simpler one is the better
*[[Sutton's law: Wikipedia|http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sutton's_law]]
**Go where the money is
**Consider the most likely conditions that the patient might have and do those tests first that have the highest liklihood of making the diagnosis the quickest and at the least expense
**Negative finding in a test with a high sensitivity ''rules out'' a diagnosis
**Positive finding in a test with a high specificity ''rules in'' a diagnosis
<<<
NEJM: [[Educational Strategies to Promote Clinical Diagnostic Reasoning|http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/extract/355/21/2217]]
[[Primer to the Internal Medicine Clerkship|http://www.im.org/Publications/PhysiciansInTraining/Documents/Primer2ndEd.pdf]]
[[Differential Diagnoses in General Medicine|http://www.geocities.com/davidscerri/contents.html]]
[[DiagnosisPro|http://en.diagnosispro.com/differential_diagnosis/home/]]
[[McGraw-Hill’s Diagnosaurus 2.0 on AccessMedicine|http://www.accessmedicine.com/diag.aspx]]
BMJ 2009;338:b1860: [[Errors in clinical reasoning: causes and remedial strategies|http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/338/jun08_2/b1860?view=long&pmid=19505957]]
Kaohsiung J Med Sci 2008;24:341: [[Current Trends in Developing Medical Students' Critical Thinking Abilities|http://ajws.elsevier.com/ajws3/abstract.asp?art_id=4564&art_journals=1]]
<<<

←上一修訂		在2018年3月14日 (三) 09:29所做的修訂版本
第16行：		第16行：
	*[http://www.accessmedicine.com/diag.aspx\| McGraw-Hill’s Diagnosaurus 2.0 on AccessMedicine]		*[http://www.accessmedicine.com/diag.aspx\| McGraw-Hill’s Diagnosaurus 2.0 on AccessMedicine]
	*[http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/338/jun08_2/b1860?view=long&pmid=19505957\| BMJ 2009;338:b1860: Errors in clinical reasoning: causes and remedial strategies]		*[http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/338/jun08_2/b1860?view=long&pmid=19505957\| BMJ 2009;338:b1860: Errors in clinical reasoning: causes and remedial strategies]
-	*[~~http~~://~~ajws~~.~~elsevier~~.com/~~ajws3~~/~~abstract~~.~~asp~~?~~art_id~~=~~4564~~&~~art_journals~~=1\| Kaohsiung J Med Sci 2008;24:341: Current Trends in Developing Medical Students' Critical Thinking Abilities]	+	*[https://ac.els-cdn.com/S1607551X08701311/1-s2.0-S1607551X08701311-main.pdf?_tid=0fa3962d-eae5-4be9-8e61-b281bfabdf77&acdnat=1521019662_8f53f85db7fd3d675a663408be840d29\| Kaohsiung J Med Sci 2008;24:341: Current Trends in Developing Medical Students' Critical Thinking Abilities]

←上一修訂		在2018年3月14日 (三) 09:05所做的修訂版本
第15行：		第15行：
	*[http://en.diagnosispro.com/differential_diagnosis/home/\| DiagnosisPro]		*[http://en.diagnosispro.com/differential_diagnosis/home/\| DiagnosisPro]
	*[http://www.accessmedicine.com/diag.aspx\| McGraw-Hill’s Diagnosaurus 2.0 on AccessMedicine]		*[http://www.accessmedicine.com/diag.aspx\| McGraw-Hill’s Diagnosaurus 2.0 on AccessMedicine]
-	[http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/338/jun08_2/b1860?view=long&pmid=19505957\| BMJ 2009;338:b1860: Errors in clinical reasoning: causes and remedial strategies\|]	+	*[http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/338/jun08_2/b1860?view=long&pmid=19505957\| BMJ 2009;338:b1860: Errors in clinical reasoning: causes and remedial strategies]
	*[http://ajws.elsevier.com/ajws3/abstract.asp?art_id=4564&art_journals=1\| Kaohsiung J Med Sci 2008;24:341: Current Trends in Developing Medical Students' Critical Thinking Abilities]		*[http://ajws.elsevier.com/ajws3/abstract.asp?art_id=4564&art_journals=1\| Kaohsiung J Med Sci 2008;24:341: Current Trends in Developing Medical Students' Critical Thinking Abilities]

←上一修訂		在2018年3月14日 (三) 09:04所做的修訂版本
第10行：		第10行：
	**Negative finding in a test with a high sensitivity ''rules out'' a diagnosis		**Negative finding in a test with a high sensitivity ''rules out'' a diagnosis
	**Positive finding in a test with a high specificity ''rules in'' a diagnosis		**Positive finding in a test with a high specificity ''rules in'' a diagnosis
-	<<<
	*[http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/extract/355/21/2217\| NEJM: Educational Strategies to Promote Clinical Diagnostic Reasoning]		*[http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/extract/355/21/2217\| NEJM: Educational Strategies to Promote Clinical Diagnostic Reasoning]
	*[http://www.im.org/Publications/PhysiciansInTraining/Documents/Primer2ndEd.pdf\| Primer to the Internal Medicine Clerkship]		*[http://www.im.org/Publications/PhysiciansInTraining/Documents/Primer2ndEd.pdf\| Primer to the Internal Medicine Clerkship]
	*[http://www.geocities.com/davidscerri/contents.html\|Differential Diagnoses in General Medicine\|]		*[http://www.geocities.com/davidscerri/contents.html\|Differential Diagnoses in General Medicine\|]
-	*[~~[DiagnosisPro\|~~http://en.diagnosispro.com/differential_diagnosis/home/]]	+	*[http://en.diagnosispro.com/differential_diagnosis/home/\| DiagnosisPro]
-	*[http://www.accessmedicine.com/diag.aspx\|McGraw-Hill’s Diagnosaurus 2.0 on AccessMedicine\|]	+	*[http://www.accessmedicine.com/diag.aspx\| McGraw-Hill’s Diagnosaurus 2.0 on AccessMedicine]
-	[http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/338/jun08_2/b1860?view=long&pmid=19505957\| BMJ 2009;338:b1860: Errors in clinical reasoning: causes and remedial strategies\|]*	+	[http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/338/jun08_2/b1860?view=long&pmid=19505957\| BMJ 2009;338:b1860: Errors in clinical reasoning: causes and remedial strategies\|]
	*[http://ajws.elsevier.com/ajws3/abstract.asp?art_id=4564&art_journals=1\| Kaohsiung J Med Sci 2008;24:341: Current Trends in Developing Medical Students' Critical Thinking Abilities]		*[http://ajws.elsevier.com/ajws3/abstract.asp?art_id=4564&art_journals=1\| Kaohsiung J Med Sci 2008;24:341: Current Trends in Developing Medical Students' Critical Thinking Abilities]

Reasoning strategies - 修訂歷史

Guhjy在2018年3月14日 (三) 09:29

Guhjy在2018年3月14日 (三) 09:05

Guhjy在2018年3月14日 (三) 09:04

Guhjy在2018年3月14日 (三) 09:03

Guhjy在2018年3月14日 (三) 09:03

Guhjy在2018年3月14日 (三) 09:02

Guhjy在2018年3月14日 (三) 08:59

Guhjy: 新頁面: *1. Hypothetico-deductive (backward) reasoning *2. Algorithmic (forward) reasoning *3. Pattern recognition **''Expert'' diagnosticians tend to use pattern recognition and algo...

Guhjy: 新頁面: 1. Hypothetico-deductive (backward) reasoning 2. Algorithmic (forward) reasoning *3. Pattern recognition **''Expert'' diagnosticians tend to use pattern recognition and algo...