Reasoning strategies

出自KMU Wiki

(修訂版本間差異)
跳轉到: 導航, 搜索
在2018年3月14日 (三) 16:58所做的修訂版本 (編輯)
Guhjy (對話 | 貢獻)
(新頁面: *1. Hypothetico-deductive (backward) reasoning *2. Algorithmic (forward) reasoning *3. Pattern recognition **''Expert'' diagnosticians tend to use pattern recognition and algo...)
←上一個
在2018年3月14日 (三) 16:59所做的修訂版本 (編輯) (撤銷)
Guhjy (對話 | 貢獻)

下一個→
第3行: 第3行:
*[[3. Pattern recognition]] *[[3. Pattern recognition]]
**''Expert'' diagnosticians tend to use pattern recognition and algorithmic thinking, but return to hypothetico-deductive reasoning if the first two strategies are unsuccessful. ''Novice'' clinical reasoners tend to use hypothetico-deductive reasoning more often than the other strategies. **''Expert'' diagnosticians tend to use pattern recognition and algorithmic thinking, but return to hypothetico-deductive reasoning if the first two strategies are unsuccessful. ''Novice'' clinical reasoners tend to use hypothetico-deductive reasoning more often than the other strategies.
-*[[Occam's razor: Wikipedia|http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam]]+*[[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam| Occam's razor: Wikipedia]]
**When you have two competing theories that make exactly the same predictions, the simpler one is the better **When you have two competing theories that make exactly the same predictions, the simpler one is the better
*[[Sutton's law: Wikipedia|http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sutton's_law]] *[[Sutton's law: Wikipedia|http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sutton's_law]]

在2018年3月14日 (三) 16:59所做的修訂版本

  • 1. Hypothetico-deductive (backward) reasoning
  • 2. Algorithmic (forward) reasoning
  • 3. Pattern recognition
    • Expert diagnosticians tend to use pattern recognition and algorithmic thinking, but return to hypothetico-deductive reasoning if the first two strategies are unsuccessful. Novice clinical reasoners tend to use hypothetico-deductive reasoning more often than the other strategies.
  • [Occam's razor: Wikipedia]
    • When you have two competing theories that make exactly the same predictions, the simpler one is the better
  • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sutton's_law
    • Go where the money is
    • Consider the most likely conditions that the patient might have and do those tests first that have the highest liklihood of making the diagnosis the quickest and at the least expense
    • Negative finding in a test with a high sensitivity rules out a diagnosis
    • Positive finding in a test with a high specificity rules in a diagnosis

<<< NEJM: http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/extract/355/21/2217 http://www.im.org/Publications/PhysiciansInTraining/Documents/Primer2ndEd.pdf http://www.geocities.com/davidscerri/contents.html http://en.diagnosispro.com/differential_diagnosis/home/ http://www.accessmedicine.com/diag.aspx BMJ 2009;338:b1860: http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/338/jun08_2/b1860?view=long&pmid=19505957 Kaohsiung J Med Sci 2008;24:341: http://ajws.elsevier.com/ajws3/abstract.asp?art_id=4564&art_journals=1 <<<